Resource Details

Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost–eVective methods

Literature: Journal Articles

Holck, M.H., 2008. Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost–effective methods. Biodiversity and Conservation,17(8), pp.2023-2036

Contact Info

mhho@tec.dk

Affiliations

Bernstorffsvej 146, st.tv, Hellerup, 2900, Denmark

Link(s)

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-007-9273-4

Description

  • This article examines the feasibility of implementing participatory forest monitoring to conserve biodiversity and improve livelihoods for local communities.
  • The accuracy, cost, and reproducibility of 3 monitoring techniques were evaluated: Bitterlich guage method, disturbance checklist transect,and 20-trees method.
  • Long-term monitoring of forest conservation sites by professional scientists, is often cost prohibitive, and uses techniques irrelevent to local community members, while simpler methods could be learned and implemented by local communities and more affordable.
  • Professional scientists and trained community members both used the 3 techniques, and the results were compared for accuracy.
  • Bitterlich and disturbance checklist methods proved cost-effective and user friendly, with local participants able to collect data with relative accuracy, after only 1 day of training.
  • Although community participation yielded positive results, discrepancies exist within the methodologies themselves, as the use of Bitterlick gave contradictory results compared to the disturbance cheklist.
  • Due to small sample size, it was unclear whetehr the 20-tree method was a reliable measure.
  • In order for this type of participatory monitoring to work, the monitoring techniques must be simple to perform for local community members without formal education, must be const-effective, and professional scientists must be willing to provide adequate foundational training  
 

Geographical Region

  • East Africa
  • Ecosystems

    Country

  • Tanzania
  • This database is a work in progress, and we need your input to keep it up to date. Feel free to contact ELTI at elti@yale.edu to provide information on your own work as well as other projects and literature currently missing from the database.

     

    ELTI is a joint initiative of:
    Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute