Resource Details

The Fate of the Tropical Forest: Carbon or Cattle?

Literature: Journal Articles

Coomes, O.T., Grimard, F., Potvin, C. & Sima, P. 2008, "The Fate of the Tropical Forest: Carbon or Cattle?", Ecological Economics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 207-212.

Contact Info

Corresponding Author: coomes@felix.geog.mcgill.ca

Affiliations

  • Department of Geography, Burnside Hall Rm 705, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 2K6
  • Department of Economics, Leacock Building, Rm. 433, McGill University, Sherbrooke St West, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 2T7
  • Department of Biology, Stewart Biology Building, McGill University, 1205 Ave Docteur Penfield, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 1B1. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancon, Panama City, Panama
  • Philip Sima, School of Architecture, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station B7500, Austin, Texas 78712-0222, USA

Link(s)

Ecological Economics

Selecting the link above redirects this page to the article on the journal website where the online material can be purchased or accessed if with subscription. For more information on access, see sidebar.

Species Info

  • Tectona grandis (exotic)

Description

  • The Clean Development Mechanism, established by the Kyoto Protocol, included small-scale afforestation and reforestation projects as a means for participating developed countries to receive credit for emission redcutions.
  • The authors conducted a small-scale study of a CDM afforestation/reforestation project proposal among the indigenous Embera people in Panama. The proposed project included 39 households that would reforest 692 ha of land (22% of community land) for carbon sequestration with teak and fruit trees. Surveys were conducted in the community to determine household opinions on the attractiveness of cattle ranching, avoided deforestation, and reforestation land-uses.
  • The researchers found that the net income (benefits minus the costs) of planting trees and selling timber at 25 years was higher (with $780 / ha income from carbon credits) than from the net income of cattle raising. However, the benefits are so far apart (in year 1 and year 25) and provide no cash flow in the intervening years.
  • Instead, the authors recommend that avoided deforestation payments (REDD+), where residents would be compensated every five years for choosing forest preservation over cattle raising would be a more viable option. In that case, the total cost of the subsidy would be effectively equivalent to the upfront payments for carbon storage. The authors suggest that avoided deforestation, or conservation of forest, should be accepted internationally as a means of carbon emissions reduction and trading.

Geographical Region

  • Southern Central America
  • Country

  • Panama
  • This database is a work in progress, and we need your input to keep it up to date. Feel free to contact ELTI at elti@yale.edu to provide information on your own work as well as other projects and literature currently missing from the database.

     

    ELTI is a joint initiative of:
    Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute